Spis treści
Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stdecades peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: „Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; „What do you wish you looked like?”; „What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; „What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 („actual”); Rtt= 0.77 („ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 („attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 („actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).
Losing weight discipline are mentioned of the Dietary Level of your Restaurants Attitudes Try (EAT) (Gather, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of sixteen comments obtained on a good 6-point scale (never ever = 0/always = 5), with highest ratings indicating a higher level away from controlled restaurants. With the Eat psychometrical services see Garner et al. (1982). This new structure coefficient both for trials, the North american country and you will German of these, was of the identical worth, a leader regarding 0.76.
Fat reduction discipline
Ineffectiveness scale. The fresh new negative connect with basis are projected from the Ineffectiveness Scale regarding the Dining Problems Collection (EDI) (Garner et al., 1983), which has shown good convergent legitimacy (ineffectiveness/self esteem ) away from Roentgen = 0.70 (p
Scientific team grabbed the extra weight and you will top actions
Body mass index (BMI). Body mass index is actually calculated as the pounds from inside https://lovingwomen.org/es/blog/novia-por-correo-legalidad/ the kilograms split up by peak from inside the rectangular yards (Body mass index = kg/m2).
Prior to research collection, an excellent airplane pilot study of the latest Silhouettes Level (Shape step one), applied to a sample consisting of 20 Mexican pupils, was applied to check the newest appropriateness of numbers to portray looks items, to corroborate an excellent acceptation out of an unidentified number of silhouettes and you will a definite knowledge of the new recommendations (the new Italian language classification currently counted with data inside value). The results showed brand new Shape Size was a great otherwise a keen appropriate means on Mexican sample.
The new detectives of the two countries, in the Mexico Area at Hae (standardized) processes. The latest questionnaires was indeed put on sets of medical and you may breastfeeding pupils in the North american country and German colleges. One of the reasons at the rear of the latest ples regarding college students connected with medicine was just the desire one (one could assume) this type of teenagers need toward medical occupation as well as for health problems, leading them to significantly more responsive to difficulties instance ED. Advised consent is actually obtained from the study members. The contacted children wanted to participate. The fresh new particular local ethics committees acknowledged the latest low-invasive process. Professional translators undertook and you can regulated the fresh new interpretation and you may retranslation of the tool.
Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for